categorized decision record templates
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
This commit is contained in:
parent
1732a785af
commit
aa5018acbc
16 changed files with 1145 additions and 0 deletions
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/Notes.md
Normal file
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/Notes.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/Office.md
Normal file
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/Office.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/calendar.md
Normal file
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/calendar.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/chat.md
Normal file
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/chat.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/file_storage.md
Normal file
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/file_storage.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/sso.md
Normal file
74
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/Applicatons/sso.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||||
|
[Source](https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/architecture-decision-record/blob/main/templates/decision-record-template-madr/index.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [option 1]
|
||||||
|
* [option 2]
|
||||||
|
* [option 3]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Outcome
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
||||||
|
* …
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 1]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 2]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### [option 3]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
||||||
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
||||||
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links <!-- optional -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
||||||
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|
||||||
35
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/readme.md
Normal file
35
docs/organisation/entscheidungen/readme.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||||
|
# Architecture Decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Infrastructure
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Deployment
|
||||||
|
- [orchestration](./Infrastructure/orchestration.md)
|
||||||
|
- [VM management](./Infrastructure/VM management.md)
|
||||||
|
- [VM deployment](./Infrastructure/VM deployment.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Backup
|
||||||
|
- [VM Backups](./Infrastructure/VM Backups.md)
|
||||||
|
- [Volume Backups](./Infrastructure/Volume Backups.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [Monitoring](./Infrastructure/Monitoring.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [Issue Tracking](./Infrastructure/Issue Tracking.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Applications
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [SSO](./Applicatons/sso.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [Filestorage](./Applicatons/file_storage.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [Calendar](./Applicatons/calendar.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [Chat](./Applicatons/chat.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [video conference](./Applicatons/video conference.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [Office](./Applicatons/Office.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [Notes](./Applicatons/Notes.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [Project management](./Applicatons/project management.md)
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue