vikunja-api/vendor/github.com/lib/pq/CONTRIBUTING.md
jtojnar ce5be947b4 Add postgres support (#135)
Revert fixture fixes for postgres

Use postgres connection string with spaces instead of url

Fix label order

Make postgres tests in ci less verbose

Add sequence update script

Skip resets in postgres

Remove option to skip resets in postgres

Make postgres tests in ci verboseq

Update test fixtures database

Fix file tests on postgres

Add postgres options to sample config

Make sure tests init test fixtures before running the actual tests

Fix issues with IDs too big to fit in an int

Fix duplicate auto incremented IDs

Refactor / Fix team tests

Refactor team member tests

Fix team member create

Fix label test

Fix getting labels

Fix test fixtures for postgresql

Fix connection string params

Disable ssl mode on postgres integration tests

Disable ssl mode on postgres tests

Use sprintf to create the connection string for postgresql

fixup! Add postgres support

Add postgres support

Added generate as a make dependency for make build

Clarify docs on building

Co-authored-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
Co-authored-by: Jan Tojnar <jtojnar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://kolaente.dev/vikunja/api/pulls/135
2020-02-16 21:42:04 +00:00

1.2 KiB

Contributing to pq

pq has a backlog of pull requests, but contributions are still very much welcome. You can help with patch review, submitting bug reports, or adding new functionality. There is no formal style guide, but please conform to the style of existing code and general Go formatting conventions when submitting patches.

Patch review

Help review existing open pull requests by commenting on the code or proposed functionality.

Bug reports

We appreciate any bug reports, but especially ones with self-contained (doesn't depend on code outside of pq), minimal (can't be simplified further) test cases. It's especially helpful if you can submit a pull request with just the failing test case (you'll probably want to pattern it after the tests in conn_test.go.

New functionality

There are a number of pending patches for new functionality, so additional feature patches will take a while to merge. Still, patches are generally reviewed based on usefulness and complexity in addition to time-in-queue, so if you have a knockout idea, take a shot. Feel free to open an issue discussion your proposed patch beforehand.