[FEATURE]: Change state of a member versus delete #297

Open
opened 2025-12-16 16:50:56 +01:00 by carla · 0 comments
Owner

Description

As a user I want to disactivate a member instead of directly deleting it

Acceptance criteria

  • We have a decision about the "delete a member flow"
  • We implement the decided flow

Questions

  • Do we want that the users need a custom field "member state" and handle the states on their own eg via string custom field
  • Do we take care of it and add a member field: member state, where the member can be disactvated archived?
## Description As a user I want to disactivate a member instead of directly deleting it ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] We have a decision about the "delete a member flow" - [ ] We implement the decided flow ## Questions - Do we want that the users need a custom field "member state" and handle the states on their own eg via string custom field - Do we take care of it and add a member field: member state, where the member can be disactvated archived?
carla added this to the Implement User Testing results milestone 2025-12-16 16:50:56 +01:00
carla added the
medium priority
question
S
labels 2025-12-16 16:50:56 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: local-it/mitgliederverwaltung#297
No description provided.